Interprofessional Grand Rounds
How to Support Patient Autonomy in Decisions about Dialysis Discontinuation
As clinicians, we are trained to be experts in the “how” of resuscitation. Today, our team wants to hold space for the “why” and the “what happens next”.
In the high-stakes environment of the Emergency Department, the "miracle myth" of CPR often collides with clinical reality. While we are frequently successful at bringing a body back, we often fail to restore the person. Research suggests that nearly 40% of hospitalized patients who survive CPR suffer from some degree of brain damage, ranging from mild memory loss to a permanent vegetative state. For the emergency medicine clinician, the chaplain, and the palliative care specialist, this reality creates a profound landscape of moral distress.
Presented by an interprofessional team, this Grand Rounds session explores the critical gap between physiological survival and a meaningful quality of life. We will examine the systemic barriers to end-of-life conversations in acute settings and the ethical friction clinicians face when medical "success" conflicts with a patient’s humanity. By exploring the shift from a "default to resuscitate" culture to a "default to the patient's voice," we will demonstrate how palliative care isn't about removing hope, it is about refining what the patient is truly hoping for. When the crisis comes, our goal is to ensure the patient’s wishes guide the plan, and the chaos doesn’t.
Physician Associate
RWJBarnabas as RWJUH, New Brunswick, NJ
Emergency Medicine Clerkship Director, Rutgers RWJMS
Interim Assistant Director for Clinical Educat…
Staff Chaplain, Jack and Sheryl Morris Cancer Center
RWJUH