Views
CAPC Palliative Care Discussion Forum
National Quality Forum Framework and Guidelines
Performance evaluationDate: Oct 16, 2007 2:44 pm
Replies:
order by
[Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
| Re:Performance evaluation (by BettyFerrell on 10/16/2007)
There are a few projects currently in progress including work by Dr. Laura Hanson in North Carolina and Dr. Karl Lorenz with the Rand Corporation/VA in Los Angeles. The latest issue of the J of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) describes some performance measures in that field. There is much work to be done in this area. The NQF practices serve as a guide as to what measures are needed or currently exist to best measure quality in our field. Betty Ferrell
|
|
| Re:Performance evaluation (by jbcassel on 10/18/2007)
Another way to think about this would be this: If in response to the guidelines, your program adds a component (e.g., a chaplain) or makes some other change, then evaluate that with appropriate process measures (e.g., when / where / how / with whom is the chaplain is involved in caring for the patient / family / PC team) and outcome measures (e.g., improved patient / family satisfaction with having emotional, existential, spiritual, religious needs met).
- Brian Cassel,
VCU Massey Cancer Center,
Thomas Palliative Care Program,
A Palliative Care Leadership Center
|
IMPORTANT: In order to post a new message or reply to an existing post in the discussion you must login. If you are not a registered member you may join here.
The statements posted in the forum section of capc.org are opinions expressed by website visitors and do not necessarily represent the viewpoints or positions of the Center to Advance Palliative Care(CAPC). CAPC is not responsible for the factual or legal accuracy of any of the statements posted.
General questions about using the CAPCconnectTM palliative care discussion forum? EmailPatricia.Caines@mssm.edu