Center to Advance Palliative Care

... ...
For Patients and Families
Partner
Sponsor
 
  Print this page
Views

CAPC Palliative Care Discussion Forum
General Operational Topics

In Reply To: Quality Metrics Reporting, QNET
Previous Message: Re:Quality Metrics Reporting, QNET
Next Message: Re:Quality Metrics Reporting, QNET

Post Re:Quality Metrics Reporting, QNET
Author: DrJoanneLynn
Date: May 18, 2011 1:18 pm

There is a need to find a way to remove persons who are very sick or who have a short life expectancy from certain quality measures. Consider, for example, mammograms and colon cancer screening. Keeping everyone in the denominator creates a pressure to waste money and incur other burdens in screening people who are very unlikely to benefit. In Britain, persons registered in the Gold Standards Registers in their Primary Care Trusts are removed from this sort of performance measure. The Gold Standards Framework [http://www.gsfs.scot.nhs.uk/ or http://www.goldstandardsframework.org.uk/] relies mostly on the "no surprise" question: is this patient sick enough that it would be no surprise if the person died in the coming year? If so, then the primary care provider puts this into their Gold Standard Registry.
What might we do that would achieve this end?

This message has no replies yet.

IMPORTANT: In order to post a new message or reply to an existing post in the discussion you must login. If you are not a registered member you may join here.
The statements posted in the forum section of capc.org are opinions expressed by website visitors and do not necessarily represent the viewpoints or positions of the Center to Advance Palliative Care(CAPC). CAPC is not responsible for the factual or legal accuracy of any of the statements posted.


General questions about using the CAPCconnect™ palliative care discussion forum?
Email: Jennifer.Raiten@mssm.edu

Lost login username/password questions? Email: Margaret.Schutz@mssm.edu