Views
CAPC Palliative Care Discussion Forum
Billing and Finance
IMPORTANT: In order to post a new message or reply to an existing post in the discussion you must login. If you are not a registered member you may join here.
The statements posted in the forum section of capc.org are opinions expressed by website visitors and do not necessarily represent the viewpoints or positions of the Center to Advance Palliative Care(CAPC). CAPC is not responsible for the factual or legal accuracy of any of the statements posted.
General questions about using the CAPCconnect™ palliative care discussion forum?
Email: Jennifer.Raiten@mssm.edu
Lost login username/password questions? Email: Margaret.Schutz@mssm.edu





Can you say more about why you think two codes are needed - what you fear will happen if such a step is not taken? What is your understanding of how the v code incidence data will be used?
Thanks for clarifying your concerns,
Kathleen Kerr
Senior Analyst
University of California San Francisco
Palliative Care Leadership Center
Currently, all of these EOL services are grouped together in the V66.7 code. If Palliative Care works earlier in the chronic disease trajectory, doesn't using this one code confuse the issue in reporting hospital data? My understanding is when Hospice is involved and death occurs,the death no longer counts towards hospital mortality. When V66.7 code is used with Palliative Care, it represents an "expected death." Is this thinking correct?
Thanks.
Julie Pipke, CPC
Reibursement Manager
Medical College of WI