Views
CAPC Palliative Care Discussion Forum
Billing and Finance
Replies:
order by
[Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
| Re:Re:EOL V-coding (by Weissman on 12/04/2008)
In follow-up to Julie Pipke's note, I understand the basic issue raised by the thread, separating out palliative care encounters early in the disease trajectory from patients seen closer to the time of death. The V66 code was not designed to capture where in the diseasae trajectory patients are seen, but rather the type of service provided. From a coding perspective, seeing patients early in the disease trajectory for symptom management and goal setting, is no different than seeing a patient near death for the same issues. Hospice gets into a completely different billing world if patients are on the Medicare Benefit. However, the palliative intervention, may be exactly the same: goal setting, symptom control, family support. Bottom line--current coding mechanisms have not caught up with the day-to-day clinical practice of HPM.
|
IMPORTANT: In order to post a new message or reply to an existing post in the discussion you must login. If you are not a registered member you may join here.
The statements posted in the forum section of capc.org are opinions expressed by website visitors and do not necessarily represent the viewpoints or positions of the Center to Advance Palliative Care(CAPC). CAPC is not responsible for the factual or legal accuracy of any of the statements posted.
General questions about using the CAPCconnect™ palliative care discussion forum?
Email: Jennifer.Raiten@mssm.edu
Lost login username/password questions? Email: Margaret.Schutz@mssm.edu




