Views
CAPC Palliative Care Discussion Forum
Billing and Finance
IMPORTANT: In order to post a new message or reply to an existing post in the discussion you must login. If you are not a registered member you may join here.
The statements posted in the forum section of capc.org are opinions expressed by website visitors and do not necessarily represent the viewpoints or positions of the Center to Advance Palliative Care(CAPC). CAPC is not responsible for the factual or legal accuracy of any of the statements posted.
General questions about using the CAPCconnect™ palliative care discussion forum?
Email: Jennifer.Raiten@mssm.edu
Lost login username/password questions? Email: Margaret.Schutz@mssm.edu





the 77 modifier is only used if the palliative physician is part of a group where another physician from the group is seeing the patient for a non-palliative visit.
Sharol Herr, RN, MSEd: Nurse Clinician/Education Coordinator; Mt. Carmel Health Palliative Care Leadership Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Julie Pipke, CPC
Reimbursement Manager, Medicine
Medical College of Wisconsin
Yes, as long as both providers are listed as the same specialty with Medicare you can add the 77 modifier to whichever claim is denied. Of course the goal is to get the modifier appended on the front end prior to submission. I have instructed our inpatient abstractors to apply the 77 to both providers' services so we don't have to play games later on. Frequently when only one service has the 77 appended, Medicare ends up paying the service that has the 77 modifier appended and denying the one that doesn't. This means we have to request an appeal by adding the 77 to the second service. Keep in mind that the primary diagnosis codes for each service should be unrelated; our guidance was that the first three digits of the ICD-9 code have to be different to use the 77.